Skip to Content
Unauthorized Trading WE ARE READY TO HELP

Unauthorized Trading Lawyers in Maryland

Unauthorized trading is a serious violation of the trust that investors place in brokers. It occurs when brokers execute transactions on behalf of investors without being granted proper authority to do so.

Pursuant to several securities laws and rules, brokers and their firms must obtain express permission from their clients before making decisions for their clients. For instance, NASD Rule 2510, enforced by FINRA, prohibits brokers from exercising “any discretionary power in a customer’s account unless such customer has given prior written authorization.” Violating this requirement constitutes unauthorized trading that can give rise to an investor’s claim for losses.

Other rules also require firms to maintain strict supervision over accounts in which brokers have been granted discretionary authority. For example, Rule 2510 requires firms to “approve promptly in writing each discretionary order” made by brokers on behalf of their investment clients, as well as to “review all discretionary accounts at frequent intervals.” A firm failing to properly supervise unauthorized trades is also a violation that may be the basis for an investor’s claim to pursue financial losses.

Contact us online or call 410-LAW-FIRM if you believe your broker caused you losses due to unauthorized trading, call Miller Stern lawyers, LLC for a free evaluation of your potential claim.

We Can Help

Additionally, the law greatly increases the duty brokers owe their clients when brokers exercise discretion on behalf of their clients, even if a customer did not grant that authority. Sometimes brokers and their firms argue investors ratified brokers’ discretionary trades they did not have the authority to make because the investors received investment statements and did not object to the trades in them in a timely manner.

Laws differ somewhat on whether such trades are unauthorized. In any event, if the broker effectively exercised discretion or control over the account, regardless of whether a customer granted that power, the broker owes the customer a heightened duty of care. That heightened duty increases the range of brokers’ conduct causing investors losses that may be pursued in claims for damages.

Brokers may have conflicts of interest when placing unauthorized trades, like generating commissions on high-commission products or per trade commission charges. Placing unauthorized trades based on the brokers’ own interests breaches their fiduciary duties owed to customers. Therefore, if investors do not recognize transactions, they should speak up sooner rather than later and ask their brokers questions, documenting all such conversations in writing, with email being effective documentation.

It is important for investors to monitor their account statements and the transactions in them to be vigilant of unauthorized trades. Unauthorized trades in a customer’s account indicates a broker’s breach of trust and disregard for rules and standards of care, which are red flags. Brokers exercising discretion, even when unauthorized, make them fiduciaries who must act only in their customers’ best interests.

Results That Matter

For people who matter to us
  • $16 Million+ Settlement

    Business Fraud: This eight figure settlement was against a large insurance company. In this case, the plaintiffs argued the company had discriminated based on age and race, and had conspired to throw cases out based on this criteria.

  • $2.5 Million Settlement

    Breach of Contract Case: This $2.5M settlement was against a financier for breach of contract. Plaintiff alleged that this breach caused his development project to go bankrupt.

  • $2 Million Settlement

    Brokerage Breach of Fiduciary Duty.

  • $1.7 Million Settlement

    FINRA Violations Lead To a $1.7M Settlement: $1,700,000 verdict was delivered against an International Broker/Dealer for FINRA violations and unauthorized trading.

  • $1.5 Million Settlement

    Loss of Assets in Brokerage Account Case: Settled for $1.5M. This case involved the unauthorized transfer of assets, which also was an issue of elder abuse. It was resolved after arbitration.

recent news

read our securities & stock broker fraud blog
  • Merrill Settles Claim for $4.25 Million Regarding Suitability Allegations
  • Brian Leggett and Bryson Holdings, LLC v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, et al
  • FINRA To Hire A Law Firm to Review Arbitrator Selection After Judge Rebukes FINRA in Vacating a Wells Fargo Award
  • $950,000 Fine to Merrill – Flawed Supervision Allowed Two Advisors to Steal $6M
  • In An Order To Vacate Award By Wells Fargo, Judge Scolds FINRA Arbitration
  • Read More On Our Securities & Stock Broker Fraud Blog


  • Dan is a great lawyer who represented me in a car accident. He has years of experience and settled my case in a quick and timely manner.
    - Lee K.
  • The lawyers at Miller Stern are top-notch! I have needed their services on several occasions and have referred them to family and friends.
    - Former Client
  • Kevin Stern is an excellent lawyer with unmatched expertise, especially within the area of medical malpractice.
    - Kelly G.
  • My daughter was in a car accident and was injured. We worked with Dan Miller throughout the process and received the settlement we deserved.
    - Andrew R.

    We'll be with you all the way

    get a free consultation and get your dedicated attornesy on your side
    • Please enter your first name.
    • Please enter your last name.
    • Please enter your phone number.
      This isn't a valid phone number.
    • Please enter your email address.
      This isn't a valid email address.
    • Please make a selection.
    • Please enter a message.
    • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy